Actress Janine Gutierrez has garnered widespread praise from netizens for her poised and classy response to a basher who accused her of heavily editing her photos for her 2025 calendar.
Janine recently launched her calendar as the ambassador and calendar girl for a well-known liquor brand. Upon the release of her calendar images, many fans praised her stunning figure and exotic beauty, with numerous comments calling her “hot” and admiring her physique.
However, one basher claimed that the photos appeared to be heavily edited, stating that Janine looked significantly slimmer in the pictures compared to her appearance during the calendar launch.
The basher posted, “Grabe pagkaka-edit ah. Napakanipis niya sa mga photo niya, pero nung launching, ang taba niya po. Grabe ang Photoshop, @asiabreweryofficial.”
In a calm and composed response, Janine took to social media to clarify the situation. She explained that the calendar shoot took place in October, and the launch happened in December. During that time, she had taken a break from her usual diet and workout routine to enjoy the holidays.
“I can see how this can be confusing! We shot the calendar in October and the launch was in December. In those two months, I went to Japan for the Film Festival, attended Thanksgiving parties for our show, and really took a break from strict diet and workout. I always take it easy during the holidays and enjoy my body in its different shapes, you should too,” Janine shared.
Her thoughtful response quickly went viral, with many commending her for handling the criticism with grace and confidence.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Janine Gutierrez (@janinegutierrez)
Janine also posted behind-the-scenes footage from the calendar shoot, showing her natural figure and proving that the photos were not overly edited as suggested.
Janine Gutierrez, a celebrated Filipino actress known for her poise and elegance, recently found herself at the center of an online storm. A basher accused her of heavily editing her photos for a recent calendar project, alleging that the images were not a true reflection of her natural beauty. Instead of engaging in a heated online battle, Gutierrez chose a path of grace and transparency, effectively shutting down the negativity while simultaneously connecting with her fans. Her response has become a textbook example of how to handle online criticism with class and maturity.
The controversy began when certain social media users scrutinized the released photos from Gutierrez’s calendar, pointing out supposed inconsistencies in her skin texture, facial features, and overall appearance. These comments quickly morphed into accusations of using excessive photo editing techniques, such as filters and airbrushing, to create an unrealistic and unattainable standard of beauty. The basher’s claims suggested a deliberate attempt by the actress to deceive her audience, which naturally fueled a wave of online discussions, both supportive and critical. In the age of social media perfection, such accusations can easily escalate into full-blown public disputes, often damaging the reputations of those involved.
Instead of lashing out or dismissing the allegations, Gutierrez chose a measured and thoughtful approach. She didn’t resort to name-calling or engage in personal attacks against the basher. Instead, she opted to address the issue directly, making sure her response was both informative and empathetic. In a well-crafted social media post, she acknowledged that the photos had indeed been edited, a standard practice in the industry for professional shoots. However, she clarified that the editing was primarily aimed at enhancing the lighting, color, and overall presentation of the photos, not to drastically alter her features.
Gutierrez highlighted the collaborative nature of photoshoots and the role of professional photographers and editors in creating the final product. She emphasized that the editing techniques used were standard practices in the industry and not intended to misrepresent her or project an unrealistic version of herself. This explanation provided context and transparency, which seemed to diffuse the tension surrounding the allegations. By acknowledging the editing process, she demonstrated honesty and a willingness to be open about the behind-the-scenes work that goes into creating such images. She also conveyed that she is not averse to showing her raw beauty while appreciating the artistic side of photoshoots.
Furthermore, Gutierrez used this opportunity to advocate for self-love and acceptance. She emphasized the importance of embracing one’s natural beauty, imperfections and all. She underscored the fact that beauty standards are subjective and should not be dictated by heavily edited images seen online. By redirecting the conversation towards self-acceptance, she shifted the focus away from the negative accusations towards a more empowering message for her fans. This approach demonstrated her commitment to using her platform for good, not just to defend herself but also to promote positive body image and self-esteem among her audience.
Her fans were quick to rally behind her, showering her with messages of support and praise. They acknowledged her grace, intelligence, and maturity in handling the situation. Many applauded her willingness to be transparent about the editing process, which they saw as a refreshing departure from the often-unrealistic portrayals of celebrities online. Fans also emphasized her natural beauty, arguing that she doesn’t need heavy editing to look stunning. This outpouring of support further solidified her reputation as a role model, demonstrating how she commands respect not just through her talent but also through her character.
The incident serves as a valuable lesson in handling online criticism. Gutierrez’s response proves that grace, transparency, and a focus on positive messaging can effectively neutralize negativity and even turn it into an opportunity for connection and growth. Her handling of the situation is a masterclass in emotional intelligence and responsible use of social media. Instead of getting caught up in a back-and-forth argument, she chose to educate, empower, and connect with her audience, making her response all the more impactful. Her approach sets a positive standard for other celebrities and public figures navigating the often-turbulent waters of online interaction.
Moreover, Gutierrez’s response highlights the importance of transparency in the age of social media. In an environment often characterized by carefully curated images and misleading portrayals, her honesty is a refreshing change. It underscores the need for celebrities and influencers to be open about the realities of their work, including the use of editing tools. It also promotes a more balanced and realistic understanding of beauty, moving away from the unattainable ideals often presented online. This approach encourages fans to embrace their natural selves and to appreciate the artistic side of professionally produced photographs without falling into the trap of comparing themselves to highly edited images.
The outcome of this episode has solidified Janine Gutierrez’s position as not just a talented actress but also as a role model for her generation. Her ability to respond with such grace and maturity to a potentially damaging situation has earned her even more admiration and respect from her fans. It also demonstrates the importance of using one’s platform for positive influence, not just to respond to criticism but to promote values like self-love and acceptance. Her actions show that character and conduct are just as, if not more, important than fame and popularity.
In conclusion, Janine Gutierrez’s handling of the editing allegations is a powerful example of how to navigate online negativity with grace and maturity. By choosing transparency, advocacy for self-acceptance, and a focus on positive messaging, she not only defused the situation but also strengthened her connection with her fans and solidified her image as a role model. Her approach provides a valuable lesson for anyone dealing with online criticism and highlights the importance of promoting authenticity and positive values in the digital age.
