The Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) clarified on Tuesday that it does not currently have jurisdiction over content on streaming platforms.
The statement comes after Senator Jinggoy Estrada criticized streaming service VMX (formerly Vivamax) for allegedly featuring “pornographic” material and exploiting performers with low wages.
In a statement, MTRCB chairperson Lala Sotto explained that the agency’s mandate, as defined under Presidential Decree 1986, is limited to regulating content on traditional platforms like television and cinema.
“Currently, online curated content does not fall within the MTRCB’s mandate. This is why we are grateful to the entire Senate for supporting amendments to the MTRCB charter to expand our scope,” Sotto said.
Sotto echoed Estrada’s concerns about protecting audiences, particularly children, in the age of digital media.
“We share Senator Jinggoy Estrada’s concerns that we need to protect our viewers, especially children, in this digital age. As one of its proactive steps, the MTRCB called the attention of subscription-based platforms and encouraged them to observe our standards,” she added.
The statement was issued after Senator Estrada delivered a privilege speech on Monday, where he called out VMX for what he described as “graphic, sexual, and exploitative material.” Estrada argued that the platform’s content lacks redeeming value and is widely accessible to younger audiences.
“Vivamax, a subscription-based popular streaming service, has gained attention not for its meaningful and family-oriented content, but for inundating the digital space with films and shows filled with graphic, sexual, and exploitative material,” Estrada said.
Estrada expressed concern over the platform’s affordability, with subscription plans ranging from ₱169 to ₱499 per month, making it easily accessible. He further accused VMX of failing to fulfill its commitment to self-regulation despite previous warnings.
“Vivamax committed to ensure that the content on its platforms aligns with Filipino cultural values, and is not objectionable for being immoral, indecent, or contrary to law. However, monitoring conducted by the MTRCB shows that their films are more suitable for pornographic sites,” Estrada said.
The senator also criticized the alleged exploitation of performers, claiming they are paid as little as ₱15,000 per day, with some films completed in as little as two days. This, he said, enables the platform to mass-produce content.
Estrada cited Article 201 of the Revised Penal Code, which prohibits the distribution, exhibition, or sale of immoral or obscene content, adding that the Philippines remains a nation grounded in moral values, family traditions, and respect for human dignity.
“While I acknowledge the importance of artistic freedom and creative expression, these should come with boundaries, especially when they begin to undermine our society’s moral fabric,” Estrada stated.
He further emphasized that his concerns were not about censorship but about protecting societal values.
“Wala po akong nakikitang redeeming values na mapupulot ang mga manonood kundi ang pagsilbihan ang mga tumatangkilik ng kalaswaan, kawalan ng respeto sa dignidad ng tao, at pagkakitaan ang ganitong klase ng pelikula,” Estrada added.
In September, the MTRCB proposed collaborating with online streaming platforms to implement content safeguards and establish a feedback mechanism, recognizing the growing demand for stronger oversight in digital media.
The MTRCB assured the public that despite the limitations of its current mandate, it continues to explore solutions to address concerns about online content.
The Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) has officially responded to Senator Jinggoy Estrada’s recent pronouncements regarding alleged “pornographic” content and other concerns surrounding Vivamax, a popular streaming platform in the Philippines. The Senator’s statements, delivered during a Senate session, sparked a public debate about the regulation of online content and the responsibilities of streaming services.
The MTRCB acknowledged Senator Estrada’s concerns and reiterated its commitment to upholding its mandate of protecting children from inappropriate content while respecting freedom of expression. The Board emphasized that it takes all complaints seriously and is actively working to address the challenges posed by the rapidly evolving digital landscape.
In its official statement, the MTRCB highlighted the existing mechanisms in place for regulating online content. While the Board’s jurisdiction traditionally covers traditional media like television and film, they are actively exploring ways to expand their reach to include streaming platforms like Vivamax. This includes ongoing dialogues with various stakeholders, including streaming service providers, to develop a more comprehensive regulatory framework.
The MTRCB also emphasized the importance of self-regulation and responsible content creation by streaming services. The Board encouraged platforms like Vivamax to implement robust internal review processes to ensure that their content adheres to established guidelines and community standards. This includes providing clear content ratings and warnings to viewers, enabling them to make informed choices about the content they consume.
The Board acknowledged the limitations of its current regulatory powers, particularly in the context of online streaming. Unlike traditional media, online content is often readily accessible and easily disseminated, making it more challenging to monitor and regulate. The MTRCB is actively working with lawmakers to explore potential amendments to existing laws to address these challenges and strengthen its regulatory authority in the digital sphere.
The MTRCB also underscored the importance of collaboration among various stakeholders, including government agencies, industry players, and civil society organizations, in addressing the complex issue of online content regulation. The Board believes that a multi-sectoral approach is crucial to developing effective solutions that balance the need to protect children with the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression.
The MTRCB reiterated its commitment to transparency and accountability in its operations. The Board publishes its decisions and guidelines on its website and regularly engages with the public through various channels to solicit feedback and address concerns. This open communication is essential to fostering trust and ensuring that the MTRCB’s actions reflect the values and priorities of the Filipino people.
The Senator’s statements have sparked a broader discussion about the evolving media landscape and the need for updated regulations. The rapid growth of streaming services has presented new challenges for regulators, requiring innovative approaches to content review and classification. The MTRCB is actively participating in this ongoing dialogue, seeking to find solutions that are both effective and respectful of constitutional rights.
The MTRCB’s response to Senator Estrada’s concerns reflects the Board’s commitment to navigating the complex landscape of online content regulation. The Board recognizes the need for a balanced approach that protects children while upholding freedom of expression. This ongoing dialogue is crucial to shaping the future of media regulation in the Philippines and ensuring a safe and responsible online environment for all.
The MTRCB’s commitment to engaging with stakeholders, exploring new regulatory frameworks, and promoting responsible content creation is essential to addressing the challenges posed by the digital age. The Board’s proactive approach is crucial to fostering a healthy and dynamic media landscape that benefits both creators and consumers alike. The dialogue sparked by Senator Estrada’s pronouncements serves as a valuable opportunity to refine existing regulations and ensure they remain relevant and effective in the face of evolving technology and changing viewing habits.